Alfred Evert
Summary Fluid-Technique

Findings
For one year I had studied literature to Schauberger (1885-1958) and I was disappointed, very most of his ideas and constructions were not realized, up to now. I did study common literature to flux-science and didn´t find anything of his attempts. So I - pure layman - decided to interpret his ideas by modern language (however not by specific scientist language) and to produce corresponding designs (only concerning fluid-mechanical aspects), however including additional aspects, not noticed by Schauberger.

In 1998 within few month, I wrote patents with some fifty designs, 200 pages of texts and 50 pages with drawings, offered this ´Fluid-Technology´ in shape of two books (only German), published summaries at my website and made all texts and drawings available as downloads. I worked trance-like, feeling myself as fluid-part, considering which kind I wanted to be moved resp. how surrounding surfaces should be shaped, how processes should be organized. Until 2002 I made diverse additional workouts and put all stuff into web.

Now I want to retire from this subject and lastly added new section Best@Evert, in order to offer new entrance to many old chapters, as brief introductions. At the following, most important contributions - by my point of view - are listed:

Flow within pipes has to be twisted

High pressure energy is demanded for throughput of liquids (and also gases) through pipes. Resistance has nothing to do with friction and corresponding heat losses.

Molecules are reflected at walls by increasing acute angles towards centre of pipe, until lastly no movement ahead exists. Pipes are self-blocking systems (unless fluid is sucked through pipes, then Bernoulli no longer is valid).

Fluid has to be guided by twisted flow, within twisted pipes. Then reflection occurs all times into wanted direction (ahead-diagonal). Cross section of pipes e.g. should show six rounded edges, twisted in longitudinal direction, then central main flow is free from ´friction´ at pipe´s wall.

Within pipe´s bow, flux has to be twisted one time

Common pipe bows are especially destructive for flows and produce enormous losses, cause inevitably comes up turbulent flows, practically stand-still of fluid. Reason of these problems is, inner side of bow is much shorter than outer side.

Only if fluid within bow is twisted one full turn around longitudinal axis, ways show same length, however way at centre is shorter than ways alongside walls. So fluid at centre moves faster ahead than fluid further outside: so ideal case of ´Potential-Twist-Flow´ results automatically.

So pipe bows has to show twisted walls (resp. edges) or at least direct in front of bows must be installed fins to initialise twist within flow.

Molecules fall into suction areas by sound-speed, resulting acceleration

If flow is guided alongside a wall ´stepping-back´, flow wants to move straight on, based at inertia. Along wall thus comes up area of less density resp. relative low pressure.

Into this ´emptiness´ molecules fall, occasionally hit into this direction by last collision, thus by normal molecular movement´s speed. These molecules fly relative far without colliding. These molecules got absent as collision partners at their origin location. Thus other molecules can also fly this direction. So into suction areas comes up ordered flow of relative parallel and nearby flying molecules.

There comes up flow of (nearby) sound-speed, as accelerating component of given technical flow´s speed. As (important) side effect results reduced static pressure (towards that backward-bended part of wall).

Well known application of this effect is lift at wings and sails. Power input for drive of airplanes resp. given wind for sailing is only triggering element. Much stronger usable force of lift, exclusively results of atmospheric pressure, thus lastly weights resp. gravity forces.

These effects are also to achieve by pure passive measurements (design of walls) and are usable by diverse applications.

Mutual affects between bodies and fluid, by suction and/or pressure, are to pay attention

Depending on aim of application, suction or pressure is to use, like listed at systematic table. All constructions of my Fluid-Technology were designed strictly according to these principles.

As an example, kinetic energy of flux has to be transferred onto mechanical parts exclusively by pressure. Only thin jet has to be redirected by solid body. Redirection may not occur by suction, at no smallest part of jet.

As an other example, by mixing up different flows, both flows must show twist, slower one must be guided tangentially onto faster flow (otherwise inevitably come up well known, enormous losses of kinetic energy).

Pumps are to design fluid-conform - and suction is better alternative

Outlet of pumps are often designed totally bad for flows. Like at previous mixing-up, outlet has to end into basin or pipe all times tangentially.

Within pumps, fluid should not be forced to move zigzag, like common practice e.g. at very most jet-engines. Opposite, fluid has to be rolled-in, also morefold within itself, so multiple twisted flows result (see e.g. Potential-Twist-Pump).

Acceleration of flow is not only achieved by mechanical pressure, much more effective is usage of suction (like e.g. at blood circulation). Often it´s sufficient only to accelerate core of flow by mechanical pressure, side flows (of larger volumes) are dragged resp. ´disappear´ into faster movement - without costs.

Drive and lift must be combined at airplanes and ships

In principle, fluid in front of vehicle has to be transported behind vehicle. Fluid in front of nose resp. bow should be sucked-off that kind, this fluid same time gets input of drive unit. Accordingly are to design lift- and drive-units, hulls and wings, however also fluid-engines.

At inlet of turbines is to organize dense and ordered flow

It´s absolutely possible to produce ´more winds´ or to concentrate flows onto water-energy-stations, i.e. natural streams are to use without building dams, e.g. also flows of sea or tides are well to use.

Much better efficiency of turbines is achieved by pulsating throughput

At turbines not at all must exist absolutely continuous throughput. If outlet is closed intermediately, given flow can only ´escape´ into tangential direction, thus is accelerated in turning sense of system. That´s decisive effect of Schauberger´s ´Repulsine´.

When water jet exits nozzle, around mouth of nozzle comes up ring vortex of surrounding air, so atmospheric air pressure (and even higher pressures) are not opposite to water jet (resp. jet-flow is protected from static pressure of air). Even water can be pumped up by air over-pressure. That´s decisive principle of Schauberger´s ´pressure areas´.

At turbines are usable pressure-waves of resonant swinging medium

If outlet of nozzle abruptly is closed, back-stroke results (analogue to Hydrostatic Ram). This pressure-wave can be mirrored within a resonance-area. Nozzle is to open /close according to run-time of pressure-wave, e.g. within water.

When nozzle is opened, water will fly off by normal molecular movement´s speed (at least sound-speed of pressure-wave), hitting onto turbine-vanes (specially shaped channels) and effecting large turning momentum. Rotor and ´vanes´ should be installed within over-pressure, so water is pumped up some centimetres (resp. is sucked up by pressure-wave into resonance-area).

Previous Resonance-Turbine (like some other constructions) are self-running motors, which take energy from molecular movement. Efficiency above 100 % (over-unity) is as perfectly natural as flyers fly, based on lift, based on effective potential of pressure-difference, which to install demands less energy input than earned benefit of lift. Perfectly natural e.g. is also efficiency of some 300 % at heat-pumps.

This surplus of benefits is to achieve everywhere by Fluid-Technology, if chaotic molecular movement for short times and locally is transformed into ordered flux (and this is done e.g. by simply organizing suction areas). Unlimited free energy of totally normal molecular movement, thus gets short-time effective and usable power.

Statements like these seams ´blasphemous´ and common scientists defend laws of energy-constance against any supposed attack. Heat-pumps e.g. show efficiency of 300 % - however modern talking is ´effort-value´ (German Aufwandszahl) of 0.33 - who ever should be ´calmed down´ by avoiding factor-values > 1.00 or percent-values > 100.

Previous Resonance-Turbine like heat-pumps don´t bother constance of energies. ´Perpetuum Mobile´ like these represent only short-time deviations for achieving any benefit for any aim. My aim was to find some of these temporary deviations - like it should be aim of any scientist to search just for these ´phenomenas´. At following section ´Nature-Usage-Laws´ I´ll point out theoretically promising ways in general.

Evert / 20.01.2004

Best@Evert Index / Sitemap Starting Page